Australia's Digital Assets Framework 2026 — What It Means for Crypto Investors
Australia's DAF Act embedded crypto platform regulation into the Corporations Act. Here's what changed, what it means for AUSTRAC registration, and how it affects you.
Australia's approach to regulating cryptocurrency platforms underwent its most significant change in the market's history when the Digital Assets Framework (DAF) Act took effect in 2025. Where previous oversight had focused primarily on AUSTRAC registration for anti-money-laundering purposes, the DAF embeds crypto platform regulation directly into Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act — the same chapter that governs traditional financial services.
What the DAF actually does
The DAF adopts an "activity-based framework." Rather than trying to classify specific tokens as securities or commodities, Australia's framework focuses on what the platform does — the activities it performs — rather than on the characteristics of any particular asset. Platforms offering custody, exchange, or broker-dealer functions for digital assets will require an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). AUSTRAC registration for AML/CTF purposes remains mandatory and sits alongside the AFSL requirement.
What changed for AUSTRAC-registered exchanges
Every exchange we compare on this site is AUSTRAC-registered — that has been the baseline since 2018. The DAF adds a higher compliance bar above that baseline. Platforms previously operating with AUSTRAC registration as their primary credential now need to be moving toward an AFSL, or operating under a transitional arrangement.
What it means for your money
AFSL-licensed entities face obligations that AUSTRAC-registered entities were not subject to: best interests duties in some contexts, dispute resolution requirements, financial services guides, and ongoing ASIC oversight. These obligations provide meaningful additional consumer protections — particularly around how platforms handle client money and assets.
The High Court Bitcoin property case
Running parallel to the DAF is a High Court case with significant implications. In May 2026, the Commissioner of Taxation filed to intervene in Poulton v Conrad, seeking to establish that an interest in Bitcoin constitutes property under Australian common law — which would confirm its taxability under the CGT regime. The ATO has long treated crypto as property for tax purposes. If the High Court affirms this at common law, it removes any remaining legal ambiguity.
What to watch
AFSL application outcomes for major Australian exchanges will be the most significant near-term development. An exchange that receives, is refused, or withdraws an AFSL application signals something material about its compliance posture. ASIC maintains a public register of AFSL holders — worth checking periodically for exchanges you use.
This is general information only, not legal or financial advice.
All 8 AUSTRAC-registered Australian exchanges compared on fees, security, coin selection and user experience.
See the full comparison →